The Lost History of Liberalism challenges our most basic assumptions about a political creed that has become a rallying cry鈥攁nd a term of derision鈥攊n today鈥檚 increasingly divided public square. Taking readers from ancient Rome to today, Helena Rosenblatt traces the evolution of the words 鈥渓iberal鈥 and 鈥渓iberalism,鈥 revealing the heated debates that have taken place over their meaning.
In this timely and provocative book, Rosenblatt debunks the popular myth of liberalism as a uniquely Anglo-American tradition centered on individual rights. She shows that it was the French Revolution that gave birth to liberalism and Germans who transformed it. Only in the mid-twentieth century did the concept become widely known in the United States鈥攁nd then, as now, its meaning was hotly debated. Liberals were originally moralists at heart. They believed in the power of religion to reform society, emphasized the sanctity of the family, and never spoke of rights without speaking of duties. It was only during the Cold War and America鈥檚 growing world hegemony that liberalism was refashioned into an American ideology focused so strongly on individual freedoms.
Today, we still can鈥檛 seem to agree on liberalism鈥檚 meaning. In the United States, a 鈥渓iberal鈥 is someone who advocates big government, while in France, big government is contrary to 鈥渓iberalism.鈥 Political debates become befuddled because of semantic and conceptual confusion. The Lost History of Liberalism sets the record straight on a core tenet of today鈥檚 political conversation and lays the foundations for a more constructive discussion about the future of liberal democracy.
Awards and Recognition
- One of Foreign Affairs' Picks for Best of 快色直播 2018
- One of Isthmus' Most Important 快色直播 of 2018 (Dave Cieslewicz)
"as the world picture darkens, [Rosenblatt's] dark picture illuminates"鈥擜dam Gopnik, New Yorker
"贰苍濒颈驳丑迟别苍颈苍驳."鈥New York Times Book Review
"The Lost History of Liberalism is a masterful work of intellectual history."鈥擜lexandre Lefebvre, Times Higher Education
"Lively and penetrating. . . . Rosenblatt shows that liberalism has survived thanks to its appeal as a moral ideal, a vision of political community that is based not just on interests but also on values: respect, tolerance, and justice."鈥擥. John Ikenberry, Foreign Affairs
"In writing another beautifully balanced, intellectually vibrant synthesis of thinkers and themes she knows incredibly well in a very readable style, Rosenblatt offers a simple reminder that there was nothing natural about the evolution of Anglo-American liberalism into liberal democracy and that, because of this, it certainly need not be our modern fate."鈥擠uncan Kelly, Literary Review
"Rosenblatt is impressive in the scope of her reading and at her best in identifying different usages of the term liberal."鈥擯eter Clarke, Financial Times
"Rosenblatt has meticulously researched the word’s history, unearthing forgotten meanings. She moves from liberalism’s roots in 19th century France and Germany to its growing association with the United States in the 20th century. Gradually, an idea that began as moralistic — and warned against the dangers of selfishness — underwent a transformation. After World War II, conservatives associated liberalism with the kind of grand social schemes they believed led to totalitarianism. Liberals retreated to a position that emphasized individual rights but not necessarily generosity toward others. Rosenblatt invites a return to this broader, Wisconsin-style view."鈥擬.J. Andersen, Boston Globe
"[Rosenblatt] presents liberals as moralists and debunks the notion of liberalism as so exclusively an Anglo-American phenomenon."鈥擳yler Cowen, Marginal Revolution
"A dispassionate overview of the term and concepts of liberalism—how it emerged, evolved, diversified, and alienated. Rosenblatt (History/Graduate Center, CUNY) has published previous works about liberalism (Liberal Values: Benjamin Constant and the Politics of Religion, 2008, etc.), and she brings considerable scholarly substance to this work, though most of it forms the infrastructure for the accessible text. . . . There are some true surprises here, too, perhaps most notably the initial liberal opposition to women's rights and a fondness for eugenics in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The author also notes, surprisingly, that factions within various liberal movements were opposed to government help for the poor—a disincentive, they claimed. Fair, balanced, and chockablock with information and surprise."鈥Kirkus
"[A] wide-ranging and important book."鈥擶arren Breckman, New Republic
"Elegantly written. . . . These discussions are welcome additions that help contemporary readers understand liberalism’s rich texture and history. . . . As we search for ways to respond to the challenges of the contemporary world, The Lost History of Liberalism offers us a valuable resource."鈥擟hristine Dunn Henderson, Los Angeles Review of 快色直播
"This books challenges some of the assumptions held about liberalism and reveals the historical foundations of why it may well be, above all, an elusive tradition."鈥擜lex Tebble, LSE Review of 快色直播
"An excellent recent survey of the term."鈥擠avid A. Bell, The Nation
"The Lost History of Liberalism is yet another impressive performance from one of the leading intellectual historians and deserving of a broad readership."鈥擬ax Skj枚nsberg, Nations and Nationalism
"I’ve spent my last days utterly enraptured with a fantastic new book that casts new light on a personal obsession: the history of the word liberalism."鈥擩effrey A Tucker, American Institute for Economic Research鈥檚 Daily Economy
"An interesting and informative read, [The Lost History of Liberalism] covers an impressive scope of material."鈥擜lex Tebble, Journal of Liberal History
鈥The Lost History of Liberalism is the most acute and careful account on the theme ever composed. Helena Rosenblatt鈥檚 accomplishment is thrilling, with self-evident implications for our own time of ideological strife.鈥濃擲amuel Moyn, Yale University
鈥淪ystematic and daring, this provocative history of ideas reveals how the ethical qualities of liberalism, understood as a protean force, should be placed front and center. Inventively tracing the liberal tradition鈥檚 tense connections to religion and its engagement with other bodies of thought, this 鈥榣ost history鈥 forces a reappraisal of various established versions of liberalism鈥檚 origins, meaning, and development.鈥濃擨ra Katznelson, coauthor of Liberal Beginnings: Making a Republic for the Moderns
鈥淭his clear and sure-footed intellectual history traces the evolution of the liberal tradition through a centuries-long international dialogue about character and the common good in which France and Germany played key roles. Against this backdrop, contemporary rights-focused Anglo-American liberalism can be interpreted as a response to the challenge of twentieth-century totalitarianism.鈥濃擶illiam A. Galston, Brookings Institution
鈥淗ow did liberalism become the dreaded L-word? While opponents portray liberalism as a set of ideas untethered to moral foundations, Rosenblatt traces out its centuries-long history, showing that proponents not only gave it a moral core but also called for leaders and citizens alike to dedicate themselves to the public good. In these times, we could use a bit of both.鈥濃擧eather Boushey, author of Finding Time: The Economics of Work-Life Conflict
鈥凌辞蝉别苍产濒补迟迟鈥檚 remarkable book challenges us to rethink the whole history of liberalism. It restores many missing elements to the story, and shows how our understanding of liberalism has been distorted by its identification with individualism by a series of writers after World War II.鈥濃擩errold Seigel, author of The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe since the Seventeenth Century
鈥淩osenblatt opens up new perspectives on what is, by any measure, an important and topical subject.鈥濃擠arrin M. McMahon, author of Divine Fury: A History of Genius
鈥凌辞蝉别苍产濒补迟迟鈥檚 The Lost History of Liberalism offers a timely account of how the words 鈥榣iberal鈥 and 鈥榣iberalism鈥 entered our political lexicon. A surprising saga, it鈥檚 also an invitation to rethink a basic鈥攁nd embattled鈥攎odern value.鈥濃擩ames Miller, author of Examined Lives: From Socrates to Nietzsche