快色直播

Most anyone interested in such topics as creation mythology, Jungian theory, or the idea of 鈥渟ecret teachings鈥� in ancient Judaism and Christianity has found 鈥済nosticism鈥� compelling. Yet the term 鈥済nosticism,鈥� which often connotes a single rebellious movement against the prevailing religions of late antiquity, gives the false impression of a monolithic religious phenomenon. Here Michael Williams challenges the validity of the widely invoked category of ancient 鈥済nosticism鈥� and the ways it has been described. Presenting such famous writings and movements as the Apocryphon of John and Valentinian Christianity, Williams uncovers the similarities and differences among some major traditions widely categorized as gnostic. He provides an eloquent, systematic argument for a more accurate way to discuss these interpretive approaches.


The modern construct 鈥済nosticism鈥� is not justified by any ancient self-definition, and many of the most commonly cited religious features that supposedly define gnosticism phenomenologically turn out to be questionable. Exploring the sample sets of 鈥済nostic鈥� teachings, Williams refutes generalizations concerning asceticism and libertinism, attitudes toward the body and the created world, and alleged features of protest, parasitism, and elitism. He sketches a fresh model for understanding ancient innovations on more 鈥渕ainstream鈥� Judaism and Christianity, a model that is informed by modern research on dynamics in new religious movements and is freed from the false stereotypes from which the category 鈥済nosticism鈥� has been constructed.